The Farmer's Daughter USA

Hi, I'm Amanda! My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm also a practicing attorney.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Work with Me
    • Speaking
    • Giveaways
    • Social Media Consulting
    • Sponsored and Guest Posts
  • About Me
    • Media
    • Terms of Use

3 Reasons The EWG’s “Dirty Dozen” Is Still a Dirty Lie

May 5, 2014

It’s that time of year again – the Environmental Working Group has released their annual “Dirty Dozen” list.

Problem is, it’s still just a Dirty Lie.

According to the organization, the items on the annual list have the highest level of pesticide residue of all produce. EWG recommends that consumers always purchase organic versions to reduce the risk of ingesting too many pesticides.

But that’s not really the whole story. Here’s are 3 reasons you should ignore EWG’s annual frightful messaging campaign.

1. The EWG’s Science is Flawed

A real study using credible scientific measurements concluded back in 2011 that the EWG’s methodology is fundamentally flawed. The study, which was published in a peer review science journal – The Journal of Toxicology, concluded:

The methodology used to create the “Dirty Dozen” list does not appear to follow any established scientific procedures. Only one of the six indicators used by the EWG crudely considers the amount of pesticide residue detected on the various commodities, and that indicator fails to relate exposures to such residues with established health criteria. Another indicator considers the percentage of samples found to be positive for pesticide residues. The remaining four indicators seem related as all appear to focus upon the existence of residues of multiple pesticides (percent of samples with two or more pesticides, average number of pesticides found on a single sample, maximum number of pesticides found on a single sample, and total number of pesticides found on the commodity) which suggests that the commodity rankings are significantly skewed to reflect instances of multiple residues. While research has demonstrated that the toxicity of a single chemical may be modulated by the presence of another chemical, such effects still require exposure to the modulating chemical to be at a level high enough (above a threshold dose) to cause a biological effect. Results from this study strongly suggest that consumer exposures to the ten most common pesticides found on the “Dirty Dozen” commodities are several orders of magnitude below levels required to cause any biological effect. As a result, the potential for synergistic effects resulting from pesticide combinations is negligible, and the EWG methodology which skews rankings due to the presence of multiple residues is not justified.

(Emphasis added.)

In other words, the EWG isn’t using any reliable science to come up with their list. And, when real scientists take a look at the data available for those 12 crops, the risk of harm from pesticide residue was negligible. Remember, the EPA has already established tolerances for how much pesticide residue a person can consumer and still have no negative effects. Regular testing of produce in the United States has routinely demonstrated that pesticide residues are well below that limit.

Sorry, but there’s nothing to see here.

2. Organic Farmers Use Pesticides Too

It’s true. So, purchasing organic food isn’t going to protect your from pesticide residue. In fact, organic pesticide residues are not routinely tested, nor are they tested with EWG’s methodology. That means that, even if there are organic pesticide residues present, EWG isn’t going to notice them. Don’t get me wrong, while organic pesticides aren’t always a cake walk — they contain real chemicals too  — you probably aren’t going to ingest dangerous levels of them.

The EWG clearly has an agenda. They promote that agenda every single day through their organization. Usually, that message includes how some substance or food is going to hurt you. They raise lots of money from that agenda. This list is nothing more than a promotional tool. Quite frankly, I’m disappointed so many news agencies give them free publicity for it.

By the way, you can read up on organic pesticides here.

3. It Isn’t Possible For You to Consume Enough Produce To Be At Risk

If you are concerned about pesticide residue, I suggest you check out the Pesticide Calculator. It tells you exactly how many servings of produce you will have to consume to be at risk. Trust me, you aren’t eating enough fruits and vegetables in a month to be enough (and that assumes that they would bioaccumulate, which they don’t, but that’s another post).

As for myself, as an adult woman, I could eat 529 servings of apple in one day without any adverse side effects from pesticide residue. Frankly, if I eat that many servings of apples in one day, I’m going to probably die from other causes a whole heck of a lot faster than I would die from pesticide residue.

Remember: the EWG is an interest group that simply wants to cause a media blur to get their message across. Do yourself a favor- don’t let the EWG’s scare tactics stop you from enjoying healthy and safe — conventionally produced — fruits and vegetables.

signature
Share this:
«
»

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: farm meme, food safety, media, organic, pesticides, science, truth

Comments

  1. Kathy says

    April 9, 2017 at 10:19 am

    I am a farmer but I am frequently torn by the responsibility of producing safe and responsible food (in our case beef & pork) and answering/defending some of these practices and studies. How do you answer the charge that I frequently hear that the very science we (as traditional ag) use to refute some of these accusations is underwritten by the very industries it is studying? In the competitive world of university grants and funding for studies, how can we expect scientists to remain objective when Big Ag is funding most of these studies?

    • Amanda says

      April 9, 2017 at 5:04 pm

      The answer to that is quite simple: we know how to evaluate when science is reliable. It doesn’t matter who funds a study or where it comes from, we should be able to look at the way it was conducted and determine if it was done reliably. How large were the control groups? Do we have enough information to replicate the study? What was the methodology used? Have others come to the same conclusion? Etc. This is precisely the process that the EPA takes when it does its assessment of pesticides before it allows them for commercial use. Of course, not all studies are done or financially supported by “Big Ag” (a term I think is really rather derogatory…). In any case, it isn’t enough to dismiss a study by simply saying it was financially supported by a certain company or group, you need to tell us why it isn’t reliable. I think you will find that “our side” generally does that, while the other side spends a lot of time just demonizing “Big Ag.”

Hi, I'm Amanda. My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm an attorney and I'm passionate about agriculture!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe via Email

Archives

Latest on Facebook

The Farmer's Daughter

5 days ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Do you a plan for your estate? My latest for AGDAILY focuses on potential changes to the federal estate tax.

... See MoreSee Less

Perspective: A farmer's legacy shouldn't be a tax nightmare for their kin

www.agdaily.com

For farm families, estate taxes aren’t just an abstract policy debate -- they’re a very real threat to generational farms and the livelihoods they support.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

2 weeks ago

The Farmer's Daughter

If nothing else, this should keep you up at night. Every snake oil salesman is now in charge of HHS.

... See MoreSee Less

How RFK Jr. Is Boosting ‘Food Babe’ and Other MAHA Acolytes

www.wsj.com

The health and human services secretary has elevated lightly regulated wellness companies and allowed advisers to keep investments, after vowing to end conflicts of interest.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

3 weeks ago

The Farmer's Daughter

These concepts aren't mutually exclusive.

... See MoreSee Less


Photo

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

4 weeks ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Imagine getting to donate a substantial amount of money to a charity of *your* choice and you choose....an animal rights activist group with questionable intentions??

... See MoreSee Less

Why agricultural advocates are lashing out at Celebrity Jeopardy! | AGDAILY

www.agdaily.com

David Friedberg, founder of The Climate Corporation, is drawing ire for his "charity" of choice on Celebrity Jeopardy!: Humane World for Animals.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

1 month ago

The Farmer's Daughter

RFK, Jr. and Elon Musk could have the duel of the century. I explain in my latest for AGDAILY

... See MoreSee Less

RFK Jr.: The most inefficient man in Trump's government | AGDAILY

www.agdaily.com

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s strategy for attacking research plays well with populist distrust in institutions, but it falls apart under scientific standards.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

Latest on Instagram

Amanda Zaluckyj

thefarmersdaughterusa

Amanda | The Farmer's Daughter USA
I'm a proud farmer's daughter & advocate for modern agriculture. U.S. farmers are leaders in sustainability.

Perusing my photos from #Denmark and getting the i Perusing my photos from #Denmark and getting the itch to travel again.
These concepts aren't mutually exclusive. #farms # These concepts aren't mutually exclusive. #farms #farmfamily #environment #soilhealth #nutritiousfood
Stop worrying about labels and just eat them! Stop worrying about labels and just eat them!
Corn is a powerhouse! #corn #farming #growcorn # Corn is a powerhouse! 

#corn #farming #growcorn #USAGrown #usagriculture
Happy St. Patrick's Day! 🍀 Happy St. Patrick's Day! 🍀
The blood moon. 🌙 And proof I woke up at 2:15 a The blood moon. 🌙 And proof I woke up at 2:15 am to see it!
3 years. 💔 #slavaukraini #supporukraine #ukrai 3 years. 💔

#slavaukraini #supporukraine #ukraine #glorytoukraine🇺🇦
Mischa will not suffer a snowman in her yard. ❄️☃️

#dogslife #dogsofinstagram #blacklab #pittiemix #snowday #snowman
We all know RFK, Jr. is well known for vaccine dis We all know RFK, Jr. is well known for vaccine disinformation. But he's also a danger to agriculture, even promising to "weaponize" regulatory agencies against our farm families.

#rfk #farmersdaughter #farmers #conspiracytheories #puremichiganfarm #rfkjr
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Jumping Jax Designs