The Farmer's Daughter USA

Hi, I'm Amanda! My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm also a practicing attorney.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Work with Me
    • Speaking
    • Giveaways
    • Social Media Consulting
    • Sponsored and Guest Posts
  • About Me
    • Media
    • Terms of Use

Putting On A Lab Coat Doesn’t Make You A Real Scientist

October 24, 2013

The consensus is real:
 this biotech corn
won’t hurt you.

“Scientists Issue GM Crops Safety Warning”

That’s the headline I saw in my Facebook feed on Wednesday morning. As you can imagine, alarm bells went off instantly. Then I realized the news organization is from the UK. The fight over biotechnology is starting to get interesting across the pond; some people have been talking about lifting the ban on biotechnology and allowing farmers to move into the 21st century.

As you can imagine, not everyone is happy about that.

The leaders of the UK biotech movement have been honestly telling people that there is a consensus: GMOs are perfectly safe. So, as a response, a statement was released by 90 so-called scientists stating that there was no such agreement. The statement read, in part:

We feel compelled to issue this statement because the claimed consensus on GMO safety does not exist. The claim that it does exist is misleading and misrepresents the currently available scientific evidence and the broad diversity of opinion among scientists on this issue.

They went on to complain that there apparently aren’t enough studies (ha!) and the studies that have been done are testing the wrong thing. They also took a dig at US researchers. Readers of The Farmer’s Daughter know that’s just plain silly.

There has never been a single scientific study showing that biotechnology is bad for people or the environment. Never.

And there has been a whole heck of a lot of studies.

But I’m a lawyer, not a scientist, so I’m not going to sit here and try to refute the groups “scientific” claims. (Besides, we all know that the anti-biotechnology crowd isn’t into the whole scientific method. There are a whole host of bad studies, lies, distortions, and the like from them. And they ignore the science that show the positive effects of biotech.)

Rather, I’d like to point out a really rather obvious fact about the folks that put out this ridiculous statement — they’re just activists. Just like these crazies.

How do I know? Because this wasn’t just a random assortment of concerned scientists that got together to come up with this statement because they’re really worried about GMOs. No, this was produced by what amounts to an interest group full of quacks dead set against any technologies (how are you a scientist and against technology?!). The group is known as the European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility or ENSSER. (Go ahead and click. Everything I’m about to tell you is proudly displayed on their website.)

They were formed precisely to get attention grabbing headlines. Get ready for their mission statement:

the advancement of science and research for the protection of the environment, biological diversity and human health against negative impacts of new technologies and their products. This especially includes the support and protection of independent and critical research to advance the scientific assessment of the potentially negative impacts. 

Bold portions are my own. That’s what these guys focus on – scare tactics. The whole goal of the ENSSER is to seek out and warn people about the allegedly negative potential of any new scientific advancement — even when they don’t have proof it exists. They formed back in 2008 because they’re worried about where the world is headed, specifically with “Climate change, loss of biodiversity, development of agro-food systems (GMOs, biotechnology, biosafety, food sovereignty), emerging technologies (e.g. nanotechnologies), degradation of ecosystem services, agricultural policy.”

In other words, modern agriculture.

Just like HSUS is set up to stand against animal agriculture, ENSSER’s sole mission is to stop scientific and technological advances in agriculture. These guys stand against the stuff that gives us higher yields, lower inputs, and better quality. These scientists have an agenda.

Besides the mission statement, how do I know these guys aren’t looking for real scientific results? Here’s the kicker: their funding comes directly from the (even crazier) groups that are spreading the anti-GMO garbage all around the world. ENSSER was set up by these anti-GMO groups to produce “science” that supports their deranged ideas.

By the way, how hypocritical that people don’t trust Monsanto because they have a “vested financial interest,” but they’re perfectly comfortable trusting a group of “scientists” whose funding comes directly from activist groups opposed to biotech.

So, who are these sponsors? They aren’t quite as obviously crazy as our environmental groups (think: PETA, Greenpeace, and HSUS). I mean, after all, they are European. But these groups have pretty simple missions: stop biotechnology. Each and every one is opposed to modern agriculture. They’re also anti-science.

How about Foundation Sciences Citoyness? They host speakers talking about “Seeds of dissent: How the biotechnology industry silenced scientific research” and “Do not open the Pandora’s box of synthetic biology.”

Or how about NABU who lobbies for “Agrarian Reform – reversing now!” in the UK? What does it mean to “reverse” agriculture? Just what you’d think — getting rid of any modern technologies, animal rights, and breaking up large farms. Sounds like they might have an interest in preventing biotechnology.

My favorite is Stiftung Gekko! What do they want? “The Gekko Foundation works to ensure that the dissemination of agro-biotechnology and its products in Europe, as well as the world [is] stopped.”

Are you noticing a pattern here? The ENSSER isn’t a group of concerned scientists. Rather, they’re a conglomerate of the anti-science activists groups that try to stop progress, science, and technology. The funding for these “scientists comes directly from huge European-style interest groups that are promoting and spreading the lies and misconceptions about biotechnology that we hear about every single day. And all of them have a big vested interest in scaring people about GMOs. That’s how they make a living is by spreading their backward propaganda.

Is it any wonder that this ridiculous statement came out right when the UK is starting to wake up to the potential to biotech? Absolutely not. Just like any other political propaganda, this statement was calculated to make an impact right now when it counts.

So before people start touting this statement as proof that biotech isn’t safe, consider that these guys are trying to prove a point. They’re trying to scare people into thinking that GMOs harbor some unknown danger. That’s what they’re getting paid to do. Just like the other fake studies on GMOs, these so-called scientists want to spread a certain message because that is their gravy train.

Talk about unethical.

The bottom line is this: real scientists, the ones that believe in the scientific method and create real studies, are at a consensus — GMOs are safe. They aren’t going to hurt you. They aren’t going to destroy the Earth. And, no, they don’t all work for Monsanto or the FDA.

What biotechnology will do is allow us to increase yields, decrease inputs, and feed a world population that is ready to explode. There is no real controversy over this. There is no real debate anymore. Just a bunch of puffed up scare tactics from a desperate campaign to win over confused consumers.

And that’s the consensus.

signature
Share this:
«
»

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: environment, food safety, GMO, Monsanto, science, technology, truth

Comments

  1. Paulo says

    October 26, 2013 at 1:50 am

    Indeed, there is no need for consensus as both science and risk assessment are based on majority opinion. Please have a look at http://genpeace.blogspot.com.br/2013/10/no-need-f…

    • thefarmersdaughter says

      October 28, 2013 at 3:46 am

      Very good article!! Indeed, consensus is NOT needed. It reminds me of Thomas Khune's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. More people need to read that book and understand how science works. Absolutely fascinating.

  2. Unknown says

    October 28, 2013 at 6:39 am

    I see you didn't have the guts to publish my comment. Color me not surprised. 🙂

    • thefarmersdaughter says

      October 28, 2013 at 12:43 pm

      Nope. I do not publish comments that ignore the facts and state a bunch of ridiculous propaganda, If the only thing you have to say is the same ignorant things coming out of the March Against Monsanto crazies, you're not getting a platform here.

Hi, I'm Amanda. My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm an attorney and I'm passionate about agriculture!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe via Email

Archives

Latest on Facebook

The Farmer's Daughter

7 days ago

The Farmer's Daughter

If nothing else, this should keep you up at night. Every snake oil salesman is now in charge of HHS.

... See MoreSee Less

How RFK Jr. Is Boosting ‘Food Babe’ and Other MAHA Acolytes

www.wsj.com

The health and human services secretary has elevated lightly regulated wellness companies and allowed advisers to keep investments, after vowing to end conflicts of interest.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

3 weeks ago

The Farmer's Daughter

These concepts aren't mutually exclusive.

... See MoreSee Less


Photo

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

3 weeks ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Imagine getting to donate a substantial amount of money to a charity of *your* choice and you choose....an animal rights activist group with questionable intentions??

... See MoreSee Less

Why agricultural advocates are lashing out at Celebrity Jeopardy! | AGDAILY

www.agdaily.com

David Friedberg, founder of The Climate Corporation, is drawing ire for his "charity" of choice on Celebrity Jeopardy!: Humane World for Animals.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

4 weeks ago

The Farmer's Daughter

RFK, Jr. and Elon Musk could have the duel of the century. I explain in my latest for AGDAILY

... See MoreSee Less

RFK Jr.: The most inefficient man in Trump's government | AGDAILY

www.agdaily.com

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s strategy for attacking research plays well with populist distrust in institutions, but it falls apart under scientific standards.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

1 month ago

The Farmer's Daughter

I'm coming clean and telling everyone the truth.

... See MoreSee Less

Here's the One Significant Difference Between GMO and Non-GMO Crops - The Farmer's Daughter USA

thefarmersdaughterusa.com

Here's the most significant difference that all consumers need to know.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

Latest on Instagram

Amanda Zaluckyj

thefarmersdaughterusa

Amanda | The Farmer's Daughter USA
I'm a proud farmer's daughter & advocate for modern agriculture. U.S. farmers are leaders in sustainability.

Perusing my photos from #Denmark and getting the i Perusing my photos from #Denmark and getting the itch to travel again.
These concepts aren't mutually exclusive. #farms # These concepts aren't mutually exclusive. #farms #farmfamily #environment #soilhealth #nutritiousfood
Stop worrying about labels and just eat them! Stop worrying about labels and just eat them!
Corn is a powerhouse! #corn #farming #growcorn # Corn is a powerhouse! 

#corn #farming #growcorn #USAGrown #usagriculture
Happy St. Patrick's Day! 🍀 Happy St. Patrick's Day! 🍀
The blood moon. 🌙 And proof I woke up at 2:15 a The blood moon. 🌙 And proof I woke up at 2:15 am to see it!
3 years. 💔 #slavaukraini #supporukraine #ukrai 3 years. 💔

#slavaukraini #supporukraine #ukraine #glorytoukraine🇺🇦
Mischa will not suffer a snowman in her yard. ❄️☃️

#dogslife #dogsofinstagram #blacklab #pittiemix #snowday #snowman
We all know RFK, Jr. is well known for vaccine dis We all know RFK, Jr. is well known for vaccine disinformation. But he's also a danger to agriculture, even promising to "weaponize" regulatory agencies against our farm families.

#rfk #farmersdaughter #farmers #conspiracytheories #puremichiganfarm #rfkjr
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Jumping Jax Designs