The Farmer's Daughter USA

Hi, I'm Amanda! My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm also a practicing attorney.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Work with Me
    • Speaking
    • Giveaways
    • Social Media Consulting
    • Sponsored and Guest Posts
  • Gift Shop
    • Cart
    • Checkout
  • About Me
    • Media
    • Terms of Use

Irony Alert: Consumer Reports Lectures Me On Respect and Accuracy

September 28, 2020

I recently wrote an article criticizing Consumer Reports for their “stop eating pesticides” piece. In short, the non-profit manipulated USDA’s annual pesticide-residue data to rank produce based on how safe it is. It then concluded–obviously without understand the organic program–that consumers should buy organic produce whenever possible. I speculated that CR wanted to copy the success of EWG’s misleading “dirty dozen” list.

Apparently the article rankled some feathers over at CR. I received an email from Jen Shecter, CR’s senior director of Content Impact & Outreach. Jen’s letter mentioned CR’s logo accompanying the article (my AGDAILY editor chooses the photos and he handled this complaint). But she then complained that my article contained “a number of inaccuracies.” She said CR didn’t copy EWG’s methodology and they acknowledged organic’s higher price tag.

I was originally taken aback by her email. Inaccuracies? I pride myself on making sure I accurately report on these things, especially if I’m going to criticize it. That’s how I establish trust with my readers. Did I miss something? Did I misstate something? I quickly pulled up my article and compared it to CR’s website.

It turns out I hadn’t messed up. Jen either didn’t read very closely, wasn’t paying attention, or really didn’t understand what CR reported. So I decided to respond to set the record straight. Here’s what I sent (in full except for mentioning the logo issue):

Hi Jen, 
…
I never stated that you used the same methodology as EWG. I said you copied their idea for a super-scary list of “dirty” food. I understand EWG has had quite a bit of success for their list, so perhaps you were hoping for the same result. But I acknowledged that you used the same data collected by the USDA, which routinely shows that consumers have nothing to worry about when it comes to pesticide residue. 


You did mention that organic food production costs more. But the remaining claims about organic pesticides are false. Organic farmers use pesticides, and aren’t required to use “non-chemical” solutions first. Nor are organic pesticides safe for humans or the environment. That statement shows a fundamental misunderstanding of chemistry. Everything is dangerous at the right dose, including water. The exact same thing can be said for conventional pesticides — they’re safe for humans and the environment.  


Unfortunately, I can’t take your concerns of food safety seriously when I see these types of statements. You’ve also used this sensationalist misinformation regarding genetically modified crops. Perhaps it’s the “experts” that you’re relying on. If you would like to talk to some individuals that aren’t on the payroll of “Big Organic,” let me know and I’ll put you in touch. 


Thanks,
Amanda

If you think Jen responded by asking for those references, you’ll be disappointed. Instead she responded with this:

[The National Organic Program (USDA) rules] specifically state that “ The OFPA and USDA organic regulations specifically prohibit the use of any synthetic substance in organic production and handling unless an exemption for using the synthetic substance is provided on the National List.” We also pointed out the many cases where conventional produce represented good choices for consumers. You may respectfully disagree with Consumer Reports, but we ask for accuracy in what is written about us and our work.

I’m honestly perplexed by the response and the point she was trying to make. There are lots of organic pesticides that farmers can use. There’s also a couple dozen synthetic pesticides exempted from the organic prohibition. And while CR’s actual ranking found most conventional food was “excellent,” it also used shocking language for no other reason than to scare people. For crying out loud the entire thing is entitled “stop eating pesticides.”

But that isn’t the worst part. I’m mostly astonished that she had the gall to say that I could respectfully disagree with CR, as long as I’m accurate.

Let’s be blunt. Consumer Reports just published a guide accusing millions of family farmers of poisoning people. It’s. A. Lie.

Our regulatory agencies carefully and thoroughly regulate pesticide use. Our applicators are trained and certified. USDA performs annual testing to make sure we’re meeting those requirements. Our farmers are doing an amazing job producing the most nutritious and bountiful food supply in history.

Yet Consumer Reports wants to lecture me about being respectful and accurate? The irony and hypocrisy is astounding. CR thinks it can say anything it wants about farmers–no matter how terrible, misleading, or false–and that’s totally fine. But if anyone calls them out on it, that’s a problem.

I’m so sick and tired of farmers being a punching bag for these folks. I’ll just respectfully suggest that Consumer Reports sticks to reviewing vacuum cleaners, toasters, and refrigerators. Leave farming to the experts.

signature

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Share this:
«
»

Filed Under: Conventional, Family Farms Tagged With: family farms, media, organic, pesticides, truth

Comments

  1. Dale Greene says

    September 28, 2020 at 11:56 am

    Good job Amanda! I’ve been away from the skeptical movement for a while and am disappointed to see how little progress the science based community has made in educating the consumer. Keep up the good work!

  2. Judy says

    September 28, 2020 at 12:11 pm

    Excellent reporting! Thank you for standing up to these bullies who use scare tactics to mis educate consumers they say they are protecting.

  3. Eric Bjerregaard says

    September 28, 2020 at 1:40 pm

    Thanks and well done. You are way more “respectful” than I would have been. The bottom line is that organizations like this are wrong and/or dishonest. Thus when they demand respect. They can give no specifics. They “think” that all who call them out are disrespectful.

  4. Grace says

    October 4, 2020 at 3:59 pm

    Thanks so much for persisting with this challenge. When I shifted my opinion on GMOs and began to share my thinking with my friends, no one shifted with me! That was disappointing. But the shocking piece came when I found out that half of my anti-GMO friends were also anti-vaxxers. Even the school nurse in our group couldn’t persuade folks that vaccines are safe.

    The stature of Consumer Reports is such that their anti-science stance is actually important and they need to change. Ag needs to persist in challenging them.

Hi, I'm Amanda. My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm an attorney and I'm passionate about agriculture!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe via Email

Archives

Latest on Twitter

4 days ago
Farmers Daughter's Twitter avatar
Farmers Daughter
@farmdaughterusa

Why are farmers so worried about weeds? t.co/4xRWJwnJ5h

  • Reply
  • Retweet 1
  • Like 1
August 3, 2022
Farmers Daughter's Twitter avatar
Farmers Daughter
@farmdaughterusa

An Open Letter to Everyone Who Eats t.co/qOGJeAusKP

  • Reply
  • Retweet 1
  • Like 4
August 1, 2022
Farmers Daughter's Twitter avatar
Farmers Daughter
@farmdaughterusa

Poultry Production Inspection Act t.co/j0jB95IbEC

  • Reply
  • Retweet 0
  • Like 0

Latest on Facebook

The Farmer's Daughter

14 hours ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Now *that's* farm to table!🤯

... See MoreSee Less


Photo

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

2 days ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Chris Edginton is president of the National Corn Growers Association. He penned this piece addressing EPA's recent decisions on important crop-protection tools. Make no mistake, the EPA's actions directly impact how well U.S. farmers grow and produce food.

... See MoreSee Less

Opinion: Farming with one hand tied behind our backs?

www.agri-pulse.com

In this opinion piece, Chris Edgington of the National Corn Growers Association discusses the Administration’s approach to regulating crop inputs.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

3 days ago

The Farmer's Daughter

"Stressed" college students trying to combat climate change are pushing their schools to ban pesticides, especially herbicides. These youngsters spend their free time on campus pulling weeds instead of...well, all the stuff they should be doing to enjoy college. Little do they know, their pursuit of ending pesticide use will actually do more harm than good to our environment.This article has all the science, snark, and flavor that makes me a happy reader.

... See MoreSee Less

'Climate-Anxious' College Students Troubled by Pesticides Need Science Lesson

www.acsh.org

Suffering from "climate anxiety," some of America's entitled college students are working to get low-risk pesticides banned from their campuses, in a bid to slow global warming. They all need therapy ...

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

4 days ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Managing weeds isn’t just about making our fields look pretty! Weeds are detrimental because they compete with our crops for limited resources. If farmers didn’t manage weed presence, the weeds would eventually get so big that they choke out the planted crops. That means our efforts, inputs, and natural resources are wasted.

... See MoreSee Less


Photo

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

7 days ago

The Farmer's Daughter

The controversy surrounding activists suing the EPA for not conducting biological evaluations under the Endangered Species Act is a bit difficult to understand. (Heck, that sentence was a bit difficult to understand.) So in my latest AGDAILY column, I've tried to distill the information and present it in a more palatable form.

... See MoreSee Less

Activist lawsuits hinder EPA's ability to balance ecological assessments | AGDAILY

www.agdaily.com

Pay-per-view boxing matches. I’ve never really understood the appeal of these things. I remember attending a bloggers’ convention in Washington, D.C., the same day as one of these high-profile eve...

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

Latest on Instagram

thefarmersdaughterusa

I'm Amanda. My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm an attorney by day, and "agvocate" at night.

Amanda Zaluckyj
Now *that's* farm to table!🤯 Now *that's* farm to table!🤯
Managing weeds isn’t just about making our field Managing weeds isn’t just about making our fields look pretty! Weeds are detrimental because they compete with our crops for limited resources. If farmers didn’t manage weed presence, the weeds would eventually get so big that they choke out the planted crops. That means our efforts, inputs, and natural resources are wasted.
A sweet treat from a coworker will hopefully bring A sweet treat from a coworker will hopefully bring some more birds to the patio. 🥰
My Congresswoman died yesterday in a car accident. My Congresswoman died yesterday in a car accident. Let this be your reminder that no matter who you are or what you accomplish, our time here is limited. So spend it wisely. 💜
Guess what, we’re not just winging it! The Poul Guess what, we’re not just winging it!

The Poultry Production Inspection Act was signed into law in 1957 by President Dwight Eisenhower. It requires the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service to routinely inspect chicken-processing facilities, ensure sanitary conditions in the facilities, and that the meat processed is fit for human consumption.

It's all part of agriculture's ability to deliver safe, nutritious, and abundant food from the farm to your plate.
Mom is showing off her new cowboy boots from @hise Mom is showing off her new cowboy boots from @hisea_official 

You can get your own pair for 10% off using discount code AMANDA10
Did you know? Did you know?
Me: Mischa pose for a cute photo with me! Mischa: Me: Mischa pose for a cute photo with me!

Mischa:
Please allow me to be the first person to wish mys Please allow me to be the first person to wish myself a happy birthday! 🥳🎂🎉

Birthdays post-cancer are a little weird. On one hand, I'm so grateful that I was blessed with another year. On the other, it feels like time is absolutely flying--how has that much time passed already? And you never know what you're rushing towards: a comfortable place where you're confident the cancer is gone forever, or your next diagnosis.

But I'm going to put those thoughts away and focus on the time I do have right here, right now. Because really, that's all any of us have. 🥂

#itsmybirthday #cancersucks #farmersdaughterstrong #bebrave
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · Website Design By Jumping Jax Designs

Go to mobile version