The Farmer's Daughter USA

Hi, I'm Amanda! My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm also a practicing attorney.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Work with Me
    • Speaking
    • Giveaways
    • Social Media Consulting
    • Sponsored and Guest Posts
  • Gift Shop
    • Cart
    • Checkout
  • About Me
    • Media
    • Terms of Use

Here We Go Again: EPA to Revisit WOTUS Rule

June 16, 2021

The Environmental Protection Agency announced last week that it will revisit its Waters-of-the-United-States rule. Farmers and agriculture groups were immediately alarmed by the decision. So what does that mean and why is there concern? I’ll attempt to explain in the most straightforward way possible. (But please bear in mind this is a very technical issue. If you want to read a more legal explanation, click here.)

What We’re Talking About

You may be wondering, “what is a WOTUS?” Congress passed the Clean Water Act back in 1972. The CWA authorizes the EPA to regulate water pollution.

The federal government doesn’t have jurisdiction (read: authority) to regulate all water within the U.S. though. So Congress had to write the legislation in a way that it fit neatly into one of its constitutional powers. It used the interstate commerce clause as its authority to regulate “waters of the United States.” The CWA defined those waters as “navigable waters.”

If you’re not sure what that means, welcome to the club. While it’s clear that the Mississippi River is a “navigable” waterway, it isn’t clear how far we take that definition. Does a smaller river count? Does a stream count? Does your farm’s drainage ditch count? Federal courts have grappled with that issue almost as long as the CWA has been around.

The 2015 WOTUS Rule

In 2015, the EPA and US Army Corp. of Engineers finalized a rule that greatly expanded the CWA’s traditional reach. It stated that not only were navigable waters within EPA’s jurisdiction, so were waters with a “significant nexus” to navigable waters.

Why does that matter? It matters because the EPA usually requires a permit if you’re discharging something that could end up in a navigable water. You know, like fertilizer. If a farmer applies fertilizer to a field with a drainage ditch, and that drainage ditch finds its way to a tributary, and that tributary runs into a stream that ultimately dumps into the Mississippi River, did the drainage ditch have a significant nexus with a navigable waterway? If it did, then you maybe need a permit. And if you don’t have one, you can be hit with significant fines or even criminal charges.

To say the least, it was a confusing rule that didn’t offer much clarity. EPA’s response to farmers’ concerns didn’t help either. The Obama administration even went so far as to say that the only people concerned about expanding the rule were those polluting our waters. Really?? That’s not helpful or reassuring when you’re trying to wok with industry stakeholders or answer concerns.

Patchwork Implementation

After the rule was finalized, things got really complicated. The WOTUS rule was immediately embroiled in litigation. I’ll spare you the grimy details, but courts were making contradictory rulings across the country. So while the WOTUS rule was effective in some places, it wasn’t effective in all places. Ultimately, it went to the Supreme Court of the United States, which promptly sent it back down to lower courts to decide.

Navigable Waters Protection Rule

President Trump ditched the 2015 WOTUS rule in an executive order shortly after taking office. In 2017, the administration replaced the 2015 WOTUS rule with the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. American Farm Bureau celebrated the new water rule as providing more clarity. In particular, things like drainage ditches and mud puddles were clearly outside of EPA’s jurisdiction.

But Here We Are

As mentioned at the start, the Biden administration has decided to reopen this issue. EPA’s Michael Regan says the Navigable Waters Protection rule allows too much environmental degradation. He stated in a press release:

We are committed to establishing a durable definition of ‘waters of the United States’ based on Supreme Court precedent and drawing from the lessons learned from the current and previous regulations, as well as input from a wide array of stakeholders, so we can better protect our nation’s waters, foster economic growth, and support thriving communities.

For his part, Regan says this time will be different. He’s prioritized drafting a rule “reflecting the experience of and input received from landowners, [and] the agricultural community that fuels and feeds the world.”

Do we believe him? I’m honestly not sure. The Obama administration’s handling of this issue was a disaster, to say the least. The messaging and application alienated rural Americans. And the WOTUS rule came out of the courts battered, bruised, and missing some limbs. I would hope Regan wants to avoid the same ending.

As you imagine, farmers are experiencing whiplash. Not to mention uncertainty. And I think they have a justified reason to be nervous about this process. We weren’t treated well last time around. So if we do this again, we need to see transparency, clarity, and compromise.

signature

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Share this:
«
»

Filed Under: Government Affairs, Water Tagged With: EPA, federal government, water

Hi, I'm Amanda. My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm an attorney and I'm passionate about agriculture!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe via Email

Archives

Latest on Twitter

2 days ago
Farmers Daughter's Twitter avatar
Farmers Daughter
@farmdaughterusa

Dr. Oz Is On The Ballot Today. t.co/yLEzA5wjQi

  • Reply
  • Retweet 0
  • Like 0
May 2, 2022
Farmers Daughter's Twitter avatar
Farmers Daughter
@farmdaughterusa

How Do Farmers Know When to Plant? t.co/hm6JVYZolA

  • Reply
  • Retweet 0
  • Like 0
April 22, 2022
Farmers Daughter's Twitter avatar
Farmers Daughter
@farmdaughterusa

Modern Agriculture & Sustainability t.co/kvW2DjAaBy

  • Reply
  • Retweet 1
  • Like 1

Latest on Facebook

The Farmer's Daughter

17 hours ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Have you heard about the situation in Sri Lanka? They decided to ban conventional agriculture in favor of organic production. Welp, it's not going so good.... 👀

... See MoreSee Less

Switch to organic is splitting Sri Lanka apart at the seams | AGDAILY

www.agdaily.com

In less than a year since Sri Lanka became the first country to fully ban conventional farming, a massive economic crisis has gripped the island nation.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

2 days ago

The Farmer's Daughter

No, no, and no.

... See MoreSee Less

Dr. Oz Is On The Ballot Today. - The Farmer's Daughter USA

thefarmersdaughterusa.com

And he has to lose. I’ll offer an apology for my regular readers that I’m only now covering this story. I randomly heard in passing that Dr. Oz was running for the U.S. Senate. But I suppose I did...

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

5 days ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Day 4 of #Plant22 is underway! Rain forecasted for this afternoon and tomorrow though.How is it where you are?

... See MoreSee Less


Photo

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

1 week ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Hi everybody. This is Mischa. I need your help. We have record-breaking high temperatures today in South Bend. It's currently 90 degrees. But mom says we all complained about the cold weather for 6 months and she's not about to turn on the air conditioning for one hot day. Please call PETA or something. 🥵

... See MoreSee Less


Video

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

1 week ago

The Farmer's Daughter

This is *still* the number one misconception about agriculture that I run into. How about you?

... See MoreSee Less


Photo

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

Latest on Instagram

thefarmersdaughterusa

I'm Amanda. My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm an attorney by day, and "agvocate" at night.

Amanda Zaluckyj
Best $15 ever spent? Probably. #summer #solarpow Best $15 ever spent? Probably. 

#summer #solarpowered #mypatio
Breakfast at @javacafesouthbend this morning. Supe Breakfast at @javacafesouthbend this morning. Super simple fruit bowl, but just what I needed.
Happy Earth Day! Modern agriculture is a story of Happy Earth Day!

Modern agriculture is a story of sustainability. Here's just a few ways that farmers protect our planet while also growing an abundant, safe, and nutritious food supply!

#earthday #earthdayeveryday #sustainability #farm #sustainableagriculture #farmers #agriculture #modernagriculture
I often find myself in courthouses, being a lawyer I often find myself in courthouses, being a lawyer and all. And unlike the general public, I usually get to take my camera inside.

#courthouse #indianacourthouse
Happy Easter! Happy Easter!
Profit isn’t a four-letter word. I understand w Profit isn’t a four-letter word.

I understand why some people are cynical. We’ve all come across hucksters and snake-oil salesmen. They’ll tell you anything you want to hear just to entice you to purchase their product. Not everyone has good intentions and values are often disregarded just to make a few dollars.

But the reality is that all of us are working for profits. That’s precisely why we go to work every day. Sure, we might really love what we do, but we still need that paycheck. We have to make money to support ourselves and our families. We have to put a roof over our heads, food in our bellies, warm water in the pipes, and heat in the vents. And, if we’re honest, we also want enough money for some frivolities.

That doesn’t make you a bad person. It doesn’t mean you’re lying to people. It doesn’t mean you’ve sold your morals down river for cash. It just means you’re just like everyone else.

Too many people believe farmers are doing bad things just to earn a buck. They believe we’re willing to deplete our soils, poison our crops, abuse our animals, and dirty our water. Why? Just so we can buy nicer things. I’m sure farmers like that exist. I don’t personally know any, but I won’t tell you it never happens. There are bad people in every profession.

But the vast majority of farmers are just like the vast majority of everyone else–good people. We don’t lie, cheat, and steal to get ahead. We take pride in our work, our farms, and our produce. Farmers try to make money for the same reasons that everyone else does–to make ends meet.

So next time you’re tempted to judge someone just for making a living, think again. Is this person really trying to increase profits, or are they trying to make a living?
Part 2. Growing my hair out after chemo! Part 2.

Growing my hair out after chemo!
What's it like growing your hair out after chemo? What's it like growing your hair out after chemo? Here's the first few months for me.

Honestly, it seemed to go faster than these photos would suggest.
#standwithukraine #standwithukraine
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · Website Design By Jumping Jax Designs