The Farmer's Daughter USA

Hi, I'm Amanda! My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm also a practicing attorney.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Work with Me
    • Speaking
    • Giveaways
    • Social Media Consulting
    • Sponsored and Guest Posts
  • About Me
    • Media
    • Terms of Use

EPA Supports Monsanto in Court. Here’s Why.

January 2, 2020

It’s no secret that Monsanto and glyphosate have taken a beating in court over the last couple years. After IARC unfairly classified the herbicide as a probable carcinogen, people have lined up to sue the company. And juries have awarded verdicts in the millions.

Not surprisingly, Monsanto appealed the first jury verdict. And the appeal is currently pending in federal court. One argument pushed by the plaintiff is that Monsanto knew glyphosate had the potential to cause cancer, and it failed to warn people who were using it. (Monsanto is primarily arguing there is no casual connection, so they can’t be liable.)

But now the EPA has stepped into the fray. Here’s why.

The EPA has oversight over all pesticides in the country. That authority is given to them by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, or FIFRA. FIFRA requires specific labels for each pesticide, which gives the user a bunch of information. Most relevant here, the label tells users how to use it, what safety gear is necessary, and what risks the user incurs. And only the EPA gets to decide what goes onto the label.

The EPA has repeatedly found no link between glyphosate and cancer. So it actually wouldn’t allow Monsanto to put a cancer warning on the glyphosate labeling. Why? Because that’s not a risk. And EPA wants to give useful and real information to pesticide applicators, not wishful thinking by trial attorneys.

Now EPA has filed a brief with the appellate court on this issue. It says that Monsanto shouldn’t be liable for not providing a warning that glyphosate causes cancer. The EPA, it argues, is the only agency that gets to decide whether that warning is on the label. And it specifically decided no warning was required. So Monsanto was following federal law. And how can you get in trouble for complying with federal law?

It’s certainly an interesting argument. Without getting into too much legalese, it’s true that you can still be negligent even if you’re following the law. But this is the flip side: can you be liable for not providing a warning, if providing a warning would’ve broken the law?

It’s also important for the EPA to make this argument. While it may not end the glyphosate lawsuits, it is crucial to FIFRA’s effectiveness. Pesticide labels are the law. And if state law or tort law can override those labels–and EPA’s authority over them–it erodes the labels’ power.

Right now we have one, uniform, and trusted labeling standard. It needs to stay that way. It’s true that state’s can impose more onerous regulations on pesticides (even banning them entirely). But they can’t mess with the label. If they could, that would make the labels essentially meaningless. Because literally every single pesticide label would say users run the risk of cancer and every other disease known to mankind. That tells the user nothing.

So I’m happy the EPA got involved. And I’ll be following this case closely. Hopefully the appellate court will realize what’s at stake here.

signature
Share this:
«
»

Filed Under: Conventional, Production Methods Tagged With: EPA, federal government, glyphosate, legal, Monsanto

Comments

  1. Heather Garrabrant says

    January 5, 2020 at 12:23 pm

    Interesting article. Please do follow up as these cases proceed. Thanks!

  2. Dennis Laughton says

    January 5, 2020 at 7:55 pm

    It is similar in every country, the regulatory authority of each country is the licensing body and all companies must follow those regulations.

Hi, I'm Amanda. My family farms corn and soybeans in Southwest Michigan. I'm an attorney and I'm passionate about agriculture!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe via Email

Archives

Latest on Facebook

The Farmer's Daughter

4 weeks ago

The Farmer's Daughter

You can't and won't make America healthy by blaming and hindering our family farmers.

... See MoreSee Less

MAHA Report delivers scathing assessment of farm pesticides | AGDAILY

www.agdaily.com

The new MAHA report, led by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., links pesticides to rising childhood illness, already drawing criticism from farm groups.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

1 month ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Do you a plan for your estate? My latest for AGDAILY focuses on potential changes to the federal estate tax.

... See MoreSee Less

Perspective: A farmer's legacy shouldn't be a tax nightmare for their kin

www.agdaily.com

For farm families, estate taxes aren’t just an abstract policy debate -- they’re a very real threat to generational farms and the livelihoods they support.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

1 month ago

The Farmer's Daughter

If nothing else, this should keep you up at night. Every snake oil salesman is now in charge of HHS.

... See MoreSee Less

How RFK Jr. Is Boosting ‘Food Babe’ and Other MAHA Acolytes

www.wsj.com

The health and human services secretary has elevated lightly regulated wellness companies and allowed advisers to keep investments, after vowing to end conflicts of interest.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

2 months ago

The Farmer's Daughter

These concepts aren't mutually exclusive.

... See MoreSee Less


Photo

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

The Farmer's Daughter

2 months ago

The Farmer's Daughter

Imagine getting to donate a substantial amount of money to a charity of *your* choice and you choose....an animal rights activist group with questionable intentions??

... See MoreSee Less

Why agricultural advocates are lashing out at Celebrity Jeopardy! | AGDAILY

www.agdaily.com

David Friedberg, founder of The Climate Corporation, is drawing ire for his "charity" of choice on Celebrity Jeopardy!: Humane World for Animals.

View on Facebook

·
Share



Share on Facebook



Share on Twitter



Share on Linked In



Share by Email

Latest on Instagram

Amanda Zaluckyj

thefarmersdaughterusa

Amanda | The Farmer's Daughter USA
I'm a proud farmer's daughter & advocate for modern agriculture. U.S. farmers are leaders in sustainability.

Perusing my photos from #Denmark and getting the i Perusing my photos from #Denmark and getting the itch to travel again.
These concepts aren't mutually exclusive. #farms # These concepts aren't mutually exclusive. #farms #farmfamily #environment #soilhealth #nutritiousfood
Stop worrying about labels and just eat them! Stop worrying about labels and just eat them!
Corn is a powerhouse! #corn #farming #growcorn # Corn is a powerhouse! 

#corn #farming #growcorn #USAGrown #usagriculture
Happy St. Patrick's Day! 🍀 Happy St. Patrick's Day! 🍀
The blood moon. 🌙 And proof I woke up at 2:15 a The blood moon. 🌙 And proof I woke up at 2:15 am to see it!
3 years. 💔 #slavaukraini #supporukraine #ukrai 3 years. 💔

#slavaukraini #supporukraine #ukraine #glorytoukraine🇺🇦
Mischa will not suffer a snowman in her yard. ❄️☃️

#dogslife #dogsofinstagram #blacklab #pittiemix #snowday #snowman
We all know RFK, Jr. is well known for vaccine dis We all know RFK, Jr. is well known for vaccine disinformation. But he's also a danger to agriculture, even promising to "weaponize" regulatory agencies against our farm families.

#rfk #farmersdaughter #farmers #conspiracytheories #puremichiganfarm #rfkjr
Load More... Follow on Instagram

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Jumping Jax Designs